A state law that hasn’t changed since 1975 caps compensation for families harmed by medical negligence. The limits apply to lost quality of life, even if a patient loses a leg, a child, or is disabled for life. Click on the picture of the map to find patients by the State Senate Districts they live in.
After the procedure, she was told the surgery went well. Still affected by the anesthesia, she was barely coherent, but they encouraged her to get dressed and leave.
By evening the next day, Patricia suddenly developed an excruciating headache and eye pain, and began vomiting. Her eye was constantly watering. These symptoms were mentioned in her discharge instructions as serious enough to call the emergency number provided by the optometrist. She called, but the clinic told her that she should wait until her appointment in the morning the next day. She tried to hold out, but the pain was so severe that she decided to go to the emergency room.
In the ER, her eye shield was removed for the first time and she realized that she had no vision in her eye at all, only darkness. After receiving medication for the pain and nausea, she was brought back to her retina surgeon’s clinic, where a sonogram revealed a large amount of debris.
The debris was a severe staph infection. The fellow at the clinic drained her eye and injected an antibiotic to treat it, but the long-term damage to her optic nerve was already done. At the urging of multiple doctors, she agreed to undergo a second, corrective surgery, but it did not help her vision and only put her through weeks more of pain and severe spikes in eye pressure. Scans show that the infection and subsequent spikes in pressure destroyed 75 percent of her optic nerve.
Patricia’s quality of life is greatly affected by her injury: “I cannot see anything clearly with that eye, no matter how close it is. I cannot see to use my iPhone, or see my computer monitors, or read anything. I cannot even see my five-month-old granddaughter’s face. My only grandchild.”
The injury resulted in permanent disability and forced her to leave her job as a paralegal, which she enjoyed and excelled at for many years. Her whole life has been turned upside down.
Meanwhile, her surgeon has showed no sympathy or remorse. Despite many visits back to the clinic, she only ever saw him after she requested to speak with him. He told her “it happens,” with regard to the infection, and said “What do you want me to do? There is nothing else we can do for you,” when she continued asking questions to see if her blindness could be improved. She has never received an apology or acknowledgement of the severity of her injury.
Patricia has spoken with several attorneys, seeking accountability and compensation for what happened to her. However, none will take her case because of California’s outdated $250,000 cap on medical malpractice damages. The surgeon’s lawyer has rejected a pre-litigation settlement, so she will not receive any compensation for her injury.
She supports the Fairness for Injured Patients Act because she wants to prevent something like this from happening to others.
Californians will have the chance to vote on the Fairness for Injured Patients Act on the November 2022 ballot. The Fairness Act would update California’s medical malpractice damage cap for nearly 50 years of inflation, and allow judges and juries to decide fair compensation in cases involving catastrophic injury or death. Learn more about this campaign for patient safety.
Meet more patients
Paid for by Consumer Watchdog Campaign for the Fairness for Injured Patients Act
Committee Major Funding from:
Consumer Watchdog Campaign Nonprofit 501(c)(4)